Autocar - First for car news and reviews

Advertisement

Top bloggers

Advertisement

Wed
Apr 23 2008

Methanol: fast, fun and green

Richard Bremner

A supercharged Lotus Exige with go-faster stripes? That sounds like an excellent way to go green.

This experimental Trifuel Exige 270E can run on any mix of petrol, ethanol or methanol, its engine management system able to detect the mix currently occupying the Lotus’s tank and adjust accordingly.

The point of this exercise is not so much to demonstrate that an engine and its fuel systems can be modified relatively easily to deal with a mixed diet, as to make the case for methanol. Which can be part-made from the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere – see our news story for more.

This Exige not only earns its stripes for being greener, but also for going faster. The standard supercharged car is quick in its standard 237bhp form, but when it’s running on methanol it gets a whole lot more powerful, the fuel’s higher octane rating enabling it to produce 266bhp. As I found at Lotus’s Hethel test track, the combination of extra-potent fuel and a supercharger work to dramatic effect. Whether you’re low down or high in the rev range, this Exige extracts itself from corners with rampaging urge. This is terrific, addictive fun. 

None of which may sound terribly green, but Lotus’s aim is to achieve guilt-free motoring by taking the car – or rather, its fuelling - out of the CO2 equation.

Its engineers make the point that once you fill your car’s tank with carbon neutral fuel it doesn’t matter how hard and uneconomically you drive, the CO2 emissions – potentially nil – remain unaltered. Now that sounds like a sensible way to enjoy the miniature supercar experience of the Exige. More than that, it sounds like a sensible reason to get behind the methanol solution.

Sign-in or register to add your comments

About Richard Bremner

Used to work for British Leyland; is now one of Autocar's most senior scribes. Despite having driven many vastly superior vehicles, he's currently hankering after a Triumph TR7.

Comments

JJBoxster April 23, 2008 2:29 PM

Richard,

What your article is missing is facts amongst its rather sweeping generalisations promising benefits!!!

Where is the methanol sourced/made - from what?

How much energy is used through the production of?

How has the normal low energy rating (42% below petrol/diesel) been lifted to 'above' petrol?

I'd also suggest any engine system having to contend with Ethanol, petrol and methanol has the most expensively engineered components (from cyclinders, tubes, pipes etc) to handle corrosiveness and other nasty aspects of these 'green' fuels this side of a Bugatti Veyron!!

Without some acknowledgement of the facts or reference to the science and engineering your article is just propoganda. Please update it with some evidence to support the generalisations you claim about its benfits compared to petrol/diesel.

cleverzippy April 23, 2008 2:39 PM

Methanol is also highly toxic and burns with an almost invisible flame. Doesn't sound very clever to me. And like Richard commented - Methanol is made in petro-chem plants which emit huge amounts of CO2 and used coal fired electricity. Still green?

loather April 23, 2008 5:20 PM

JJ, re your comments above - brilliant(and kudos to cleverzippy).

The wind is turning, and I don't mean the idling windmill blade breezes. I mean folk are sick, sick and sick again of propaganda on carbon footprint this, neutral the other, CO2 'evil' and so on. We're all being made to pay through the nose for this deceit and don't expect to come to a petrolhead publication for some light relief from the 24/7 coshing over the head from the green fascists only to find the same pravda-style propagandizing here. Get back to the bread-n-butter exciting cars, performance and so on core subjects. There's a clue in the term 'petrolhead'  - Give us back our petroleum spirit!

JJBoxster April 23, 2008 5:20 PM

Yes I'm afraid a couple of Autocar journalists display the same lack of hard research data in their scribblings combined with sweeping generalisation techniques similar to lowly snakes amongst politics, climate propogandists and Al Gore!

The second smarmy characteristic is running for cover after putting out misinformation of globally inaccurate proportions and never coming back to answer!!

I wouldn't want to dump Richard Bremner into this snake pit until he's answered. He may have found an alternative energy that's green, gives fantastic bang per buck like petrol and diesel provides and doesn't cost the Earth to produce in terms of subsidies, food/land loss and gives more (a multiple) in output than it consumes in input.

We await Richards 'discovery' and answers with baited breath......

JJBoxster April 23, 2008 5:38 PM

Thanks Loather. I'm an admirer of your posts too. Sharp, informed and bang on the button.

I think any journalist (in any media) that just passes on propoganda, half truths and lies without doing his/her research is failing in their duty and their ethics. A journalist should 'add-value' to the news by adding a well-informed opinion or two not just pass it on like a robot.

Otherwise you're 'an accessory' to propoganda and lies. Journalists have a duty to readers to be accurate and provide some balance. That's simply not happening in the media by any stretch of any journalists imagination when you look at the Ethanol con, climate con or CO2 con. Dumb robot sheep more like.

Autocar is more vocal than most but it doesn't come close to a 10 page pull out on Ethanol being a national scandal which it is. Just from the fact it's been force fed down our throats rammed with legislation which nobody has had any debate or vote on.

Why are we being force-fed lower energy (more expensive) at the same price? Why can't WE DECIDE in a democracy at the pumps for ourselves between putting Petrol, Diesel or Ethanol P*ss in our tanks!!

loather April 23, 2008 6:12 PM

JJ, re your last comment - hang in there buddy, the tide is definitely turning.

Happy St George's Day!

JJBoxster April 23, 2008 7:33 PM

Yeah C'mon England! ..stand up for yourself. 1.6M signed an online petition against road charging, Minister said "we'll certainly listen". Now look at their incredibly deceptive plans at MIRA for constant monitoring and the ability to charge via satalite. It's pure unbridled contempt for the public from supposed public representatives.

Sooner these snakes are sent packin' the better.. that's about to happen on the smoking ban. Smokers and the publicans didn't protest and lost their rights for a pefectly legal activity with no health issues.

Off to Amsterdam next week, the first meeting of smokers from all over the globe to hammer out how to hammer the fight back against the Health fascists and the pile of BS they peddled - their case is as fake on science and full of propoganda and downright lies as the climate-con and Iraq/WMD issues. Trust me they haven't a health fact to stand on.

But by us not protesting they got away with it. Smokers got a 3hr debate before the die was cast. Foxes got 40hrs because country folk protested like Bulldogs. At some point the fight back has to get organised over the travesty, ignorance and con of goverment motoring policy. Sooner the better.

I've come to the point, like you I think, where I've just had it up to the back teeth with any more taking of my  freedoms, any more Nannying and tax-grabbing and prudes telling me what I can and can't do.

Don't get mad, get even. I'd like to walk into the offices and chambers of parliament with 20M smokers or 30M motorists and throw the w*nkers, their policies and their petty rule books into Thames. Life would improve so quickly without these leeches.

TKaye April 26, 2008 9:28 AM

What a shame Richard doesn't take the time to look at the Lotus website:-

www.grouplotus.com/.../66

I have no connection with Lotus but it will answer some of the questions about how the menthanol is made. Perhaps the  most important bit of all that Richard omitted is the following:-

"An alcohol-based fuel derived renewably from atmospheric CO2 would allow society to transfer relatively easily to sustainable, carbon-neutral internal combustion. Lotus Engineering is researching the use of sustainable synthetic alcohols as potential future fuels, with technology available from Lotus for introduction in four to five years. However, the supply infrastructure investment from governments and fuel companies could take 15 to 20 years."

By 2023 - 2028 someone may be offering a different "solution",  until then lets enjoy what we have!  

cleverzippy April 26, 2008 2:00 PM

I see someone from (I presume Autocar) deleted my other comment about this story. Well unfortunately it doesn't stop this article from Richard being a poor and badly researched piece. Must try harder next time, Richard (senior!).

All about Autocar

Newsfeeds

Subscribe to our news with our RSS feeds

Advertise

To advertise with Autocar contact us

Buy our magazines

Discover our titles at themagazineshop.com

Autocar latest issue -

NEW ISSUE OUT NOW

FAST, EASY & SECURE
SUBSCRIBE NOW>>