Autocar - First for car news and reviews

Advertisement

Top bloggers

Advertisement

Wed
Mar 26 2008

I remember when Sciroccos were special

James Ruppert

A chance encounter with an original version got me thinking about the all-new Volkswagen Scirocco. To be honest, it’s a concept that I’m still struggling with. 

Because the original Scirocco was one of the best coupes of all time, encapsulating all the virtues that the breed is meant to exemplify. It looked good, it drove well and it cost everyday hatchback money to run.

The mk1’s crisp lines, sharp handling and sturdy mechanicals earned it a devoted following back in the day – it was a sort of middle-class answer to the Ford Capri. Okay, so the ‘seventies rust-proofing meant that most of the first generation had fallen to pieces well before Maggie left power, but in the combination of general niceness with near-Golf practicality, the Scirocco led the way.

Now the new Scirocco is going to be bigger, heavier and considerably more ugly. I’m reliably informed that it doesn’t look as bad on a motorshow stand as it does in the pictures, but it’s still definitely not an oil painting. Okay, so we should be thankful it’s not a retro mash-up – most manufacturers’ first instinct when raiding their heritage – but it does just seem to be trying a little too hard.

But the biggest problem is cost. The original Scirocco matched the equivalent Golf’s engine-and-spec designations pretty much across the board. You could even get a 1.6 GL for schlepping your way to the shops and back. The new version looks like it’s heading fast and furiously to a drifting competition – with a 2.0 litre turbocharged motor a no prospect of change from £25 grand when it eventually goes on sale.

The old Scirocco was a nice car, driven by nice people. The new car has so little to do with the old that I’m wondering why they bothered reviving the windy old name. VW should have stuck with the IROC tag of the concept. Alternatively, if they were determined to reach into the corporate badge-drawer, then surely the new car would be better off wearing the Corrado tag – the original Scirocco’s punky younger sister.

The whole thing has left me feeling distinctly nostalgic, though. You can keep your TFSI engine, I’m off to find one of the last surviving mk2 Scalas to revel in its cheesy bodykit, chunky alloys and colour-keyed bumpers.

Sign-in or register to add your comments

About James Ruppert

Used to sell BMWs, but he's no yuppie; has a '64 Mini Cooper in his garage and a '57 BSA Bantam in his house. Has bought and sold hundreds of used cars, and he isn't finished yet.

Comments

blktoy March 26, 2008 7:16 PM

I think the new Scirocco is nicer than the IROc concept. Looks less like an Audi too.

blasos1983 March 27, 2008 9:45 AM

Is this yet another VW "sportscar" that is actually just another boring Golf clone?

LateKnight March 27, 2008 11:02 AM

Mr Ruppert quotes "Because the original Scirocco was one of the best coupes of all time, encapsulating all the virtues that the breed is meant to exemplify. It looked good, it drove well and it cost everyday hatchback money to run."

Whats to say the new one wont do exactly that.

I think you will find the Mk2 Scala is a bit of a culture shock. They do NOT drive as well as you think you remember them.

The name IROC comes from the name scIROCco anyway, as well as the VW UP! comes from the forthcoming lUPo.  

Quattro369 March 27, 2008 11:41 AM

Ive heard a wide variety of estimates on the Pricing.

Last thing i heard was the 2.0 (197bhp) would be £20.5k which puts it on par with the Golf GTi, this surely cant be right?

As for the styling, its definately not as striking as the IROC but i will reserve final judgement when i see it in the metal.

Lastly, i dont think this deserves the 'coupe' tag. It should just be the stylish facelifted 3dr Golf. If the coupe looks this bland what chance has the next Golf got. Looks like VW is deffo taking a backwards step here. This new coporate face cant last for long....

RobotBoogie March 27, 2008 1:14 PM

I think what you might call the prestigisation of the UK car market - where BMWs, Audis and Mercs sell in similar volumes to Fords and Vauxhalls - has really skewed the notion of what constitutes an "affordable" car. To me something affordable is maybe an MX5 - sports car fun and zip in a practical package for £15K. A VW three door that is too visually upright to even properly qualify as a coupe for £20K is not affordable. It is taking the p!ss.

996dreamer March 28, 2008 10:37 AM

By the time I was able to afford a Corrado, I didn't want one anymore as they were too old so the prospect of a new Scirocco/Corrado was very appealing. This new car doesn't hit the spot. As mentioned it seems closer to a golf GTI 3 door than an actual coupe. With the demise of affordable coupes in the traditonal sense i.e. Celicas, Corrado,Calibra etc, VW had the opportunity to create an appealing car to us in their late 20's who havent quite yet made it into the M3 league. I guess I'll have to do with my 52 plate A3 for a bit longer :(

coolGav March 28, 2008 10:51 AM

At least the Audi TT looks like coupe, the Sirocco is unlikely to be a success unless VW drop the 3dr Golf. And wouldn't it have been better in concept to start with a Polo for their "cheap" coupe anyway?

I wonder when/if Fiat will do a new coupe based (loosly) on the Bravo?

All about Autocar

Newsfeeds

Subscribe to our news with our RSS feeds

Advertise

To advertise with Autocar contact us

Buy our magazines

Discover our titles at themagazineshop.com

Autocar latest issue - Autocar 14.5.08

NEW ISSUE OUT NOW

FAST, EASY & SECURE
SUBSCRIBE NOW>>