Autocar - First for car news and reviews

Advertisement

Top bloggers

Advertisement

Tue
Feb 05 2008

Honda's new S2000 is a safer bet on a slippery bend

Steve Cropley

The new, improved Honda S2000 isn’t much different from the old one in look, sound or spec, except that they’ve changed the suspension again to make it more predictable on a track. The 1999 original would understeer until you got close to the limit when, abruptly, it would do the other thing too quickly for a normal mortal to catch. There were improvements in ‘04, but they weren’t the final answer.

So when we learned that the new ‘08 version had been given the further modded chassis from the Japanese S2000 Type-S, our first priority was to try it on a track. As it turned out, Honda had a bunch of cars at Brands Hatch, so we came up with a series of tests which would establish once and for all whether this was a car you could trust on the limit.

First, I drove a few laps myself. It felt decent. The understeer was still there, but fainter, but the old snappy tail-happiness seemed to have disappeared.

Then I enlisted the aid of racer-***-hack Tony Dron (right), a truly skilful driver, and we turned another seven or eight laps at full noise, using the morning dampness to amplify any problems. Again, the car felt stable, predictable and pretty quick. Tony had no beef with the car, and from my spot beside him, there seemed no threat of the old rapid rear breakaway. Even if you brake too late and entered a bend too fast, you can drag this new car through in a stable sort of way.

At lunch, I suddenly realised we hadn’t tried the car with its new Vehicle Stability Assist (VSA) turned off — as it can be by confident drivers. I wanted to be sure the new-found stability was built-in and not merely electronic, so I attacked the track again, this time with vastly experienced racer-instructor David Roucka-Brown, whose intimate knowledge of Brands helped me get going quite well. Then David drove.

The car seemed perfectly stable and predictable at and over the limit in the dry, to the extent that the only difference we could notice, VSA on or off, was a small improvement in braking stability into corners (VSA on). The system didn’t seem to intrude when working, which leads me to conclude that its main function is to rescue you when you’ve seriously overcooked it, or over-estimated the grip on damp roads.

All in all, the ‘08 S2000 seemed a very good — though pricey — track-day option, what with its inate stability, its quick steering, its six close ratios, its bulletproof, rev-forever VTEC engine, its low seating position and its compact dimensions.

And does it swap ends when provoked? On pretty decent evicdence, I'd say no.

Technorati tags: , ,

Sign-in or register to add your comments

About Steve Cropley

Road tester of 35 years and columnist of 15, Steve says he’s as much in love with cars today as he was on day one. “And not just the cars, but also the industry that makes ’em.”

Comments

jbroadis February 6, 2008 4:00 PM

A S2000 that handles - at last...

I owned an early 'V' plate S2000 for 18 months, and whilst there were many things I fondly remember (the shape, the engine above 6000, the "techno" interior), I never gelled with the car in terms of handling. There is a high speed bend I take every day (M25 to M4) which in other cars (current = old shape Toledo V5) can be taken with confidence at speeds of upto 85 in the dry, and 70 with a damp surface. In the S2000 I never got beyond 75 in the dry without fearing for my life, and I wouldn't dream of trying in the wet; entering the bend the car would be overwhelmed by understeer unless entered on a trailing throttle - then you'd need a fair dose of throttle to try to settle the car. But it would never settle, it would easily be upset by minor surface imperfections and end up in confidence eroding lurches. Net result was a car that you could never be reponsibly driven anywhere near 100% on a public road - which was ironic because that was the only zone where the engine gave its best. Shame.

I'd love to re-visit my S2000 experience with a new model, but life has moved on and I now have 3 kids, so I'll have to wait for a mid-life crisis to have another...

Doc B February 8, 2008 12:33 PM

JBroadis wrote:

"Net result was a car that you could never be reponsibly driven anywhere near 100% on a public road - which was ironic because that was the only zone where the engine gave its best."

This is why my wife and I bought our MX5 instead of a 3 year old S2000- we felt there would be more opportunites to have fun in safety!

All about Autocar

Newsfeeds

Subscribe to our news with our RSS feeds

Advertise

To advertise with Autocar contact us

Buy our magazines

Discover our titles at themagazineshop.com

Autocar latest issue - Autocar 26 Nov

NEW ISSUE OUT NOW

FAST, EASY & SECURE
SUBSCRIBE NOW>>